Recently, there was an article in The Atlantic about Iowa and some reflections on the state from a professor who has lived there and taught at the University of Iowa for the last twenty years. Understandably, it was harsh, honest, unfettered, and insulting to Iowans who think their state is the best and should be allowed to be a ridiculously disproportionate weight in who gets to be the presidential nominee for both parties. It’s insane. It’s a state of 3 million (less than 1% of the US population), and are 91% white. Give me a break.
Things Iowans got pissed off about in Stephen Blooms article: references to “non-existent” mudrooms; a hunting fanaticism, a huge emigration of young people; it contains several meat-packing plants that hire non-union (il)legal immigrants to earn essentially nothing for a filthy, and unsafe job; an exceptionally high suicide rate; and finally that religion is the glue that binds Iowans together.
Most of the people outside of Iowa would respond, in order, okay, yep, huh, I think I heard about that, didn’t know that, and no shit.
Bloom’s article triggered a bunch of comments which always teach me a lesson that I apparently refuse to learn – if I really want to be pushed over the edge, the best way is to read reader comments on any article posted on the internet. It also brought on two published articles, one by the University of Iowa’s president, Sally Mason, and another by some recently laid-off reporter.
My response to the university President who felt it was important to declare that Stephen Bloom “did not represent the University of Iowa in his opinion” basically made me wonder if she just felt like she needed some attention. Bloom didn’t sign the piece, “the University of Iowa.” He signed it with his name. So no shit Madame President. Thanks for declaring that and letting us all know how great you think Iowa is. Congratulations on being one of a few “literary cities of the world.” I’m not sure what I means, but here is a gold star.
And to the reporter who got bent out of shape over mudrooms, the crackling of corn, and some other stuff that essentially didn’t matter. That’s great that Dubuque just did a $30 million renovation on a luxury hotel, but that money might have been better spent making sure people have even heard of that city.
Anyway, as someone who went to college in the South and got to experience what to me was a very different culture for four years, I understand what he is saying. He wasn’t insulting Iowa to be mean. He was being brutally honest. Something that people don’t like. And Iowans should own it and do what they can to improve the state. Don’t lie to the rest of us. I’m a Californian. Our state is totally jacked up. I own that. I’m not going to try to tell other people that we have our financial house in order. Californians like to spend money that we don’t tax ourselves for.
And of course there is Bloom’s observation about religion. This is a point that neither of his responders addressed because there is nothing to address. It’s true, pure and simple. This was also something that I learned while at school in Texas. There is a baseline assumption among everyone you meet that you are a Christian. People are pleasant and friendly, and most probably don’t even realize that they are making this assumption, but in my experience it is there. When, in some off-hand conversation or experience, this assumption gets blown up, there was always some kind of reaction. Some people didn’t care, but were surprised to find out nonetheless. Others, withdrew and were still friendly enough, but being a non-believer, I was now less relatable. And of course, there were the few that had never made the assumption in the first place and it was a big deal. This was the minority, but they existed. If I had been gay, it would probably have been an even bigger issue, maybe not to my face, but in the absence of my presence, I can assure you that I would have been ever more of an outsider.
My point is, Iowans and people in the Midwest need to be open to criticism. If Bloom lived there twenty years, he’s an Iowan and I’d take his experience for what it’s worth. He has no incentive to lie or make anything up. It’s also good to be proud of your state, but no to the point of denial. Don’t talk about “small farmers” like they are the everyman. The majority of farms are huge agri-businesses that are heavily subsidized by our government. The common farmer is probably getting dicked over by Monsanto every year. Don’t sell me the farming lifestyle, when your farmers are getting screwed. I like growing stuff. I like gardening. I also read enough to know the whole small farmer thing is the same thing that comes out of your Holsteins – bullshit.
Everyone wants to think their state is great – and in some ways every state is great. It’s when people can’t take the criticism. People in the Midwest put down us egg-headed, coastal elite, limousine liberals all the time like they know what the hell they’re talking about. If you can dish it out, then be able to take it, especially from someone who has actually lived there for a long period of time.
Finally, no offense, but you don’t deserve to have as much influence over the presidential primary process as you do. Neither does New Hampshire, another tiny, mostly white state. It’s bogus. I don’t care how seriously you take your politics. There are people that take politics seriously in all states, most of which have more people than you and a more expansive array of issues other than Farm Bill subsidies for your resident agri-conglomerates. It’s not personal. It’s just that reality doesn’t defend your position.
And for the love of the God that most of you Iowans believe in, don’t get bent out of shape that your state is perfect. If I had a nickel for every time some journalist slammed California for not having it’s financial issues in check, I’d be able to fix our deficit myself.